Bioenergy combined with CCS could enable carbon-negative energy

By Erin Voegele | February 19, 2013

Erin Voegele

Stanford University’s Global Climate and Energy Project has released a report highlighting the potential to combine bioenergy production with carbon capture and storage techniques to enable carbon-negative energy production.

"Net negative emissions can be achieved when more greenhouse gases are sequestered than are released into the atmosphere," said Jennifer Milne, an energy assessment analyst at GCEP and lead author of the report. "One of the most promising net-negative technologies is BECCS, or bioenergy with carbon capture and storage."

Information released by Stanford notes that typical BECCS systems convert biomass into electricity, chemicals or fuels. The carbon dioxide (CO2) released during the conversion process is then captured and stored. According to the university, this type of technology could be employed at power plants, ethanol plants, biorefineries, paper mills and other manufacturing facilities.

The report identifies a total of 16 BECCS projects in various stages of development around the world, including six ethanol projects, one gasification project and one pulp and paper project in North America. In addition, one Brazilian ethanol project, one African ethanol project, three European ethanol projects, two gasification projects in Europe and two European pulp and paper projects are included on the list. Each project stores CO2 either geologically or through beneficial reuse. One project in the Netherlands does both.

A press release issued by the university specifically highlights a project launched by the U.S. DOE at an Illinois-based ethanol plant in 2009. The project, located at an Archer Daniel Midlands Co. ethanol plant in Decatur, Ill., captures approximately 1,000 metric tons of CO2 per day from the biofuel fermentation process and sequesters it in a sandstone formation 7,000 below ground.

While BECCS projects hold significant potential for mitigating CO2 emissions, the report describes several challenges these projects currently face. According to the analysis, the fluctuating price of carbon presents a significant challenge, as does the absence of recognizing “negative” emissions in existing CO2 reduction incentive schemes. The authors of the report also point to scale-up, availability of sustainable biomass resources, and the high cost of carbon capture and storage as challenges.

With regard to biomass, the analysis also addresses the potential to mitigate CO2 emissions with biochar. According to information released by Sandford, one advantage of biochar is its simplicity. However, the researchers also stress that long-term CO2 sequestration would require high biochar stability.

A full copy of the report, titled “Assessment Report from the GCEP Workshop on Energy Supply with Negative Carbon Emissions,” can be downloaded from the Stanford University website. 




1 Responses

  1. Almuth Ernsting



    GCEP's report - as all calls for Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) ignore a vast volume of scientific studies which show that large-scale bioenergy is anything but carbon-neutral (which, by implication means, it's anything but carbon-negative with BECCS). For a list of some of the studies that look at carbon impacts of biomass power stations, see . Not only this, but the authors ignore many of the uncertainties, technical hurdles and major risks involved in carbon capture and storage. The costs associated with BECCS are such that the only likely prospect of large-scale 'BECCS' involves capturing CO2 from ethanol fermentation (and nobody can call corn ethanol carbon neutral!) in order to pump more oil out of partially depleted wells, i.e. to increase fossil fuel emissions. Please see our recent report for details: .


    Leave a Reply

    Biomass Magazine encourages encourages civil conversation and debate. However, we reserve the right to delete comments for reasons including but not limited to: any type of attack, injurious statements, profanity, business solicitations or other advertising.

    Comments are closed